Ethical Principles and Publication Policy

Ethical Principles and Publication Policy
The JAILT editors are fully aware of the issues delineated in the Code of Conduct and Best-Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors and declare their total adherence with them.
Likewise, together with editorial board members and reviewers, authors submitting manuscripts to JAILT are also expected to follow the universally accepted rules of publication ethics and avoid publication malpractices.

JAILT and editors firmly express that all manuscript handling and publications will be conducted according to globally accepted principles and rules of academic publication ethics. We also expect JAILT authors and reviewers to be aware of these and strictly abide by them.

For more information on the issue, please consult these two articles:

Statement on Publication Ethics for Editors and Publishers

Best Practice Guidelines on Publication Ethics: a Publisher's Perspective
 
In the event of any suspected publication malpractice thought to be taking place in a JAILT article, please directly contact the editors. All such allegations will be investigated by senior members of the editorial board. In a proven case of malpractice, the alleged article will be retracted, and our community will be made aware of the case. However, in a case needing a correction, clarification, or apology, appropriate open announcements will be made on the JAILT webpage.

 
TO AUTHORS:
Authors who will submit papers to JAILT have to upload their ethics committee approval (permission) or informed consent, as well as state these issues in their papers.

This information should be given on the paper at the end of the paper but before references. The following sentence is a sample for the authors:

Ethics Committee Approval: Ethics committee approval was received for this study from (XXXX University, January 2026, XYZ2381236). The committee title, approval date, and permission of the ethics document's number must be stated. This information should be given in the methods section of the main text as well. Informed Consent: Written consent was obtained from the participants.

Or
Ethics approval examples:
Ethical approval for this study was obtained from … (Committee title, approval date and permission of ethics document's number).
Informed consent examples:
Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects before the study.
Verbal informed consent was obtained from all subjects before the study.
Written informed consent was obtained from legally authorized representatives before the study.
Verbal informed consent was obtained from legally authorized representatives before the study.